ArticleBMJ open2025
Impact of interpregnancy weight change on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus during a second pregnancy in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Peripartum Changes in CCL2 Associated with Maternal Metabolic Status?Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- History of large-for-gestational-age birth is independently associated with subsequent gestational diabetes in Chinese multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the impact of interpregnancy weight changes (IPWC) on the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the second pregnancy.
designA single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted in China.
settingData were collected in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from 2013 January to 2021 February.
participantsParticipants include women who had two consecutive singleton deliveries after 28 gestational weeks (n=2372). OUTCOMES: The GDM in the second pregnancy (s-GDM) was set as the outcome.
methodsIPWC was defined as the change in body mass index between the first trimester of the second pregnancy and that of the first pregnancy, categorised into four groups with -1 kg/m² to <1 kg/m² as the reference. Adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs attained from multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association between IPWC and s-GDM, in both total subjects and stratified subgroups.
resultsIn the overall analysis, s-GDM was found to be significantly associated with IPWC value (aOR 1.111; 95% CI 1.038 to 1.190) and an IPWC category of ≥3 kg/m² (aOR 1.821; 95% CI 1.197 to 2.772). In the stratified analysis, the significant association between IPWC ≥3 kg/m² and s-GDM was evident only in the subgroups of an interpregnancy interval (IPI) of less than 36 months (aOR 2.210, 95% CI 1.251 to 3.904), under the age of 35 (aOR 1.854, 95% CI 1.204 to 2.857), non-diabetic status in the first pregnancy (f-ND) (aOR 1.872, 95% CI 1.143 to 3.065) and those with normal weight in the first pregnancy (aOR 1.936, 95% CI 1.174 to 3.193). The significant association between IPWC value and s-GDM was also shown only in these subgroups (p<0.05). In f-DN subgroup, even an IPWC category of 1 kg/m² to <3 kg/m² was significantly associated with s-GDM (aOR 1.486, 95% CI 1.044 to 2.117). IPWC < -1 kg/m² was not significantly associated with s-GDM either in the overall analysis or in the stratified analysis (p>0.05).
conclusionAn IPWC of 3 kg/m² or higher may increase the risk of s-GDM, particularly among women with an IPI of less than 36 months, those under 35 years old, individuals without diabetes, or those with normal weight during their first pregnancy. The potential influence of prior GDM on the relationship between IPWC and s-GDM warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.