ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2025
Topical anesthetics methods used to reduce needle pain/discomfort prior to local anesthesia in children and adolescents: a scoping review.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mucoadhesive patch versus benzocaine gel for reducing injection pain: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Trial
- Procedural Pain, Hall Technique Crowns and Separators: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Pilot Feasibility Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Efficacy of ethyl chloride topical anesthesia application on pain perception during intra-oral injections in children compared to benzocaine gel-a single-blind randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to review the most effective topical anesthetic methods for reducing pain/discomfort prior to dental local anesthetic needle puncture for dental procedures in children and adolescents.
methodsA scoping review was conducted. Individual search strategies were developed for each of the bibliographic databases (Cochrane, Embase, LILACS, LIVIVO, Pubmed, Scopus, PsyINFO, Web of Science), and in the gray literature (Google Scholar, Open Gray), comprehensively, without restrictions on language, publication data, or level of socioeconomic development of the country in which the study was conducted. The search was conducted on April 21, 2021 and the updates on May 24, 2024. Randomized controlled studies conducted in patients up to 18 years of age were included. Variables collected: characteristics of the included studies, topical anesthetics evaluated, time and the mode of application.
resultsInitially, 8579 studies were retrieved. Then 3127 were identified as eligible, of which (n = 3127), 52 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. The most commonly observed anesthetic methods with the most favorable outcomes were lidocaine, benzocaine, ice cooling, and EMLA. Spray, gel or patch were used, with application times ranging from 1 to 10 min. Mucosal cooling an ice stick was analyzed by eight studies. Only one showed a smaller reduction in pain perception scores than others.
conclusionsCooling is a technique with numerous clinical advantages from the clinical point of view, for reduction of pain/discomfort prior to needle puncture of dental local anesthesia in children and adolescents. It is an accessible, inexpensive and pleasant method that does not resemble needles or unpleasant tastes, nor involves systemic toxicity and complications that may be associated with others anesthetics agents. Future randomized controlled studies in accordance with the Consort Statement are needed to further investigate the topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39856200What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.