Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856247›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025

The Ca

Agnes Hackl, Lutz T Weber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnes HacklDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. agnes.hackl@uk-koeln.de.
Lutz T WeberDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrity of the filtration barrier of the kidney relies on the proper composition of podocyte interdigitating foot processes. Their architecture is supported by a complex actin-cytoskeleton. Following podocyte stress or injury, podocytes encounter structural changes, including rearrangement of the actin network and subsequent effacement of the foot processes. Immunosuppressive drugs, which are currently used as treatment in proteinuric kidney diseases, have been shown to exert not only immune-mediated effects. This review will focus on the direct effects of glucocorticoids, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab on podocytes by regulation of Ca

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingImmunosuppressive AgentsNephrotic SyndromePodocytesProteinuriaActin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsCalcium ChannelsHumansProtective AgentsActinsCalcium ChannelsImmunosuppressive AgentsProtective AgentsCyclosporine AGlucocorticoidsMycophenolate mofetilNon-immunologic effect on podocytesRituximabTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID39856247
PMCPMC12296978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.