Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856369›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2025

Mechanistic insights into Wnt-β-catenin pathway activation and signal transduction.

Madelon M Maurice, Stephane Angers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Host andGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cotinine Promotes Cancer Cell Proliferation and mEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madelon M MauriceCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands. M.M.Maurice@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6885-5361
Stephane AngersDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research and Department of Biochemistry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. stephane.angers@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-9044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, Wnt proteins govern stem and progenitor cell renewal and differentiation to regulate embryonic development, adult tissue homeostasis and tissue regeneration. Defects in canonical Wnt signalling, which is transduced intracellularly by β-catenin, have been associated with developmental disorders, degenerative diseases and cancers. Although a simple model describing Wnt-β-catenin signalling is widely used to introduce this pathway and has largely remained unchanged over the past 30 years, in this Review we discuss recent studies that have provided important new insights into the mechanisms of Wnt production, receptor activation and intracellular signalling that advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie this important cell-cell communication system. In addition, we review the recent development of molecules capable of activating the Wnt-β-catenin pathway with selectivity in vitro and in vivo that is enabling new lines of study to pave the way for the development of Wnt therapies for the treatment of human diseases.

Indexed as

beta CateninWnt ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayAnimalsCell CommunicationHumansbeta CateninWnt Proteins

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.