Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856540›Full record

SynthesisBMC neuroscience2025

Association between apolipoprotein E ε4 status and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis.

Zijun Ren, Zhenting Guan, Qingliang Guan, Hongjian Guan, Huiying Che

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Medicine and Individual Autonomy: Reflections on Knowledge Societies and Governmentality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zijun Ren *Department of Neurology, Yanbian University hospital, City of Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Zhenting Guan *Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Qingliang GuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, City of Zhucheng, Zhucheng Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Zhucheng, Shandong Province, China.
Hongjian GuanDepartment of Neurology, Yanbian University hospital, City of Yanji, Jilin Province, China. hjguan@ybu.edu.cn.
Huiying CheDepartment of General Medicine, Yanbian University Hospital, City of Yanji, Jilin Province, China. 281081668@qq.com.

Funding

Jilin Province science and technology development plan project, China YDZJ202201ZYTS225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) status has a controversial role in predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) factors. This meta-analysis assessed AD event risk in patients with APOE ε4 status. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe relevant English-language articles were identified by searching the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The prognostic significance of APOE ε4 status in AD patients was examined on the basis of pooled hazard ratios (HRs).

resultsA total of 22 studies published after 1987, including 571,800 patients, were included. Consequently, APOE ε4 status was a risk factor for disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 2.033; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.589-2.602; P = 0.000; I 2 = 93.1%) in patients with AD. Additionally, subgroup analysis suggested that the ROC curve was the main risk factor among patients with AD.

conclusionsAD patients with different events are managed via different methods; however, the present meta-analysis suggests an increased risk of AD events in patients with different APOE ε4 statuses.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApolipoprotein E4Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansRisk FactorsApolipoprotein E4Alzheimer’s diseaseAPOE ε4 statusMeta-analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39856540
PMCPMC11761182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.