Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856750›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2025

Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions.

Aaron C Weidman, Zach Sedor-Schiffhauer, Chase Zikmund, David D Salcido, Francis X Guyette, Leonard S Weiss, Ronald K Poropatich, Michael R Pinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaron C WeidmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-4051
Zach Sedor-SchiffhauerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chase ZikmundDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
David D SalcidoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Francis X GuyetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Leonard S WeissDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ronald K PoropatichCenter for Military Medicine Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael R PinskyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Autonomous diagnosis and management of the critically ill during air transport (ADMIT)R01HL141916 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PINSKY, MICHAEL R · 2019 to 2022
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141916NIH HHS 1R01HL141916U.S. Army W81XWH2210610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital emergencies require providers to rapidly identify patients' medical condition and determine treatment needs. We tested whether medics' initial, written impressions of patient condition contain information that can help identify patients who require prehospital lifesaving interventions (LSI) prior to or during transport.

methodsWe analyzed free-text medic impressions of prehospital patients encountered at the scene of an accident or injury, using data from STAT MedEvac air medical transport service from 2012 to 2021. EMR records were used to identify LSIs performed for these patients in prehospital settings. Text was cleaned via natural language processing and transformed using term frequency-inverse document frequency. A gradient boosting machine learning (ML) model was used to predict individual patient need for prehospital LSI as well as seven LSI subcategories (e.g., airway interventions, blood transfusion, vasopressor medication).

resultsA total of 12,913 prehospital patients were included in our sample (mean age = 52.3 years, 63% men). We observed good ML performance in predicting overall LSI (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.793, 95% confidence interval = [0.776-0.810]; average precision = 0.670, 95% confidence interval = [0.643-0.695] vs. LSI rate of 0.282) and equivalent-or-better performance in predicting each LSI subcategory except for crystalloid fluid administration. We identified individual words within medic impressions that portended high (e.g., unresponsive, hemorrhage) or low (e.g., droop, rib) LSI rates. Calibration analysis showed that models could prioritize correct LSI identification (i.e., high sensitivity) or accurate triage (i.e., low false-positive rate). Sensitivity analyses showed that model performance was robust when removing from medic impressions words that directly labeled an LSI.

conclusionsML based on free-text medic impressions can help identify patient need for prehospital LSI. We discuss future work, such as applying similar methods to 9-1-1 call requests, and potential applications, including voice-to-text translation of medic impressions.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNatural Language Processinglifesaving interventionmachine learningmedic impressionsnatural language processingprehospital

Identifiers

PMID39856750
PMCPMC12077067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.