ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Predictive imaging in abdominal oncology: current trends and future directions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- A novel interpretable machine learning framework integrating clinicopathological and radiomic features for early recurrence prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Understanding Liver and Digestive Diseases: A Paved Road to Improve Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment.Exploration of digestive diseases · 2026Article
- Advanced imaging techniques at the crossroads of cholangiocarcinoma and liver transplantation: Can we bridge the gap?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant biliary system tumor and the second most common primary hepatic neoplasm, following hepatocellular carcinoma. CCA still has an extremely high unfavorable prognosis, regardless of type and location, and complete surgical resection remains the only curative therapeutic option; however, due to the underhanded onset and rapid progression of CCA, most patients present with advanced stages at first diagnosis, with only 30 to 60% of CCA patients eligible for surgery. Recent innovations in medical imaging combined with the use of radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to improvements in the early detection, characterization, and pre-treatment staging of these tumors, guiding clinicians to make personalized therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of how radiological features of CCA can be analyzed through radiomics and with the help of AI for many different purposes, such as differential diagnosis, the prediction of lymph node metastasis, the defining of prognostic groups, and the prediction of early recurrence. The combination of radiomics with AI has immense potential. Still, its effectiveness in practice is yet to be validated by prospective multicentric studies that would allow for the development of standardized radiomics models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.