Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857285›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Vertebrate TNF Superfamily: Evolution and Functional Insights.

Ignacio Marín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ignacio MarínInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IBV-CSIC), 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-8961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study characterizes the evolution of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) across vertebrate lineages, both cyclostomes and gnathostomes, by combining sequence similarity and synteny data for the genes from 23 model species. The available evidence supports a simple model in which most of the diversity found in living species can be attributed to the expansion of four genes found in an ancestor of all vertebrates before the first of the genome duplications that occurred in the vertebrate lineages. It is inferred that the ancestor of all cyclostomes possessed only six TNFSF genes. A cyclostome-specific genome triplication had little effect on the total number of these genes. The ancestor of all gnathostomes, due to the effect of a second genome duplication plus additional single-gene duplications, already had 21 TNFSF genes. In several gnathostome lineages, particularly in some tetrapods, the TNF superfamily has significantly contracted due to numerous gene losses. This evolutionary model provides a framework for exploring functional data, showing that the descendants of different ancestral genes have acquired distinct roles, most prominently in the innate and adaptive immune systems, which led to a species-specific refinement of which TNFSF genes were conserved or lost. Several data hitherto difficult to interpret (the interactions of very different TNFSF ligands with the same receptors; the ability of the same ligands to bind alternative receptors, with or without death domains; and the cooperation of different ligands in specific functions) can be explained as consequences of the evolutionary history of the TNF superfamily.

Indexed as

adaptive immunitycell signalingligand evolutionnetworkTNFtumor necrosis factorwhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID39857285
PMCPMC11762692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.