ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Biomonitoring of Hydroxylated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Metabolites in Workers at a Waste-to-Energy Incinerator, Turin, Italy.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the human biomonitoring of ten urinary OH-PAHs (hydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) in a cohort of workers at an incinerator in Turin, Italy. Long-term exposure was assessed through repeated measurements at three time points: before the startup (T0), after 1 year (T1), and after 3 years (T2). Paired data were available for 26 subjects, seven administrative workers (AWs) and 19 plant workers (PWs). Short-term exposure was assessed by comparing start-end shift measurements. Due to the non-normal distribution of the data, the nonparametric Cuzick's test for trend and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples were used. Neither the trend nor the T0-T2 comparison tests resulted in statistically significant outputs in the two groups (q-value > 0.05), even when controlling for smoking habits. In relation to PWs, some of the metabolites were higher at T2 with respect to T0, but no linear increase was found. Conversely, 1-OH-PYR (ng/g creatinine) showed lower median values at T1 (61.5) and T2 (67) compared to the baseline (151.3). Similarly, short-term comparisons yielded no significant results, with rather overlapping distributions of values. Overall, no significant increases in metabolite levels were detected as a result of occupational exposure in the incinerator workers considered. These findings align with previous results for metals and ambient air measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.