Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Workplace Health and Wellbeing in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Provision and Support Uptake.

Nigel Lloyd, Nigel Smeeton, Imogen Freethy, Julia Jones, Wendy Wills, Abi Dennington-Price, John Jackson, Katherine Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Workplace Wellbeing in Ontario's Public Sector: Employee and Employer Perspectives on Workplace Supports.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nigel LloydSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-1957
Nigel SmeetonCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-5411
Imogen FreethySchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
Julia JonesCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-7362
Wendy WillsCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-6045
Abi Dennington-PriceSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
John JacksonSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
Katherine BrownSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (UK) NIHR131573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's challenging times highlight the need for workplaces to support employee wellbeing. Workplaces can offer a means to improve employee wellbeing and promote health initiatives. However, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are less likely than larger organizations to engage with workplace wellbeing initiatives or offer wellbeing provision. This study, conducted in an urban area in central England, explores SME engagement with local government workplace wellbeing provision, and barriers and facilitators to SME engagement, SME implementation of wellbeing provision, and employee uptake. A mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected via a survey of 103 SMEs and qualitative data from three focus groups with stakeholders involved in promoting SME engagement with wellbeing support (n = 9) and 16 in-depth interviews with SME representatives (n = 8) and employees (n = 8). Quantitative data were analyzed using the chi-squared, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative data were analyzed using framework analysis. Findings highlighted several interrelated factors acting as barriers and facilitators to SME engagement with wellbeing initiatives, SME-provided wellbeing provision, and employee uptake. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers, public health teams, and SME leaders on improving provision of and engagement with wellbeing programs. Trust, awareness, knowledge, and communication are highlighted as important prerequisites of optimal provision and engagement.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational HealthWorkplaceAdultEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalebarriers and facilitatorshealth and wellbeinghealth and wellbeing supportmixed methodpublic healthsmall and medium sized enterprisesSMEworkplace health promotionworkplace wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39857543
PMCPMC11764598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.