Evidence mapPaperPMID 39857552Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Associations Between Daily-Use Products and Urinary Biomarkers of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Adults of Reproductive Age.

Jayne Marie Foley, Carol F Kwiatkowski, Johanna R Rochester, Iva Neveux, Shaun Dabe, Michael Kupec Lathrop, Eric J Daza, Joseph J Grzymski, Ben K Greenfield, Jenna Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jayne Marie FoleyMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0774-1305
Carol F KwiatkowskiMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-1218
Johanna R RochesterMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Iva NeveuxHealthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4138-0120
Shaun DabeHealthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-962X
Michael Kupec LathropMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Eric J DazaMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8376-1600
Joseph J GrzymskiHealthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Ben K GreenfieldPublic Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME 04104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-7635
Jenna HuaMillion Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5462-0772

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES034312NIEHS NIH HHS R43ES034312NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES034312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily-use products, including personal care products, household products, and dietary supplements, often contain ingredients that raise concerns regarding harmful chemical exposure. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in daily-use products are associated with numerous adverse health effects.

methodsThis pilot study explores the relationship between concentrations of EDCs in urine samples and products used 24 h prior to sample collection, and ingredients of concern in those products, in 140 adults of reproductive age in Northern Nevada.

resultsHaving higher numbers of products and ingredients of concern, especially in the personal care category, was associated with higher levels of mono-(-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP). Similarly, taking more supplements was associated with higher levels of methylparaben (MePB). In contrast, using household products with more ingredients of concern was associated with lower levels of monobutyl phthalate (MBP). Generally, women used more products, were exposed to more ingredients of concern and had higher urinary metabolites than men. Participants who rated themselves as being in poor/fair health were exposed to more personal care and supplement ingredients of concern than those in better health. Interestingly, those in excellent health also took supplements with more ingredients of concern.

conclusionsGreater product use and more ingredients of concern are associated with urinary metabolites of known EDCs and self-ratings of poor health. Women and people who take supplements are at greater risk, and even people who consider themselves to be healthy can be highly exposed. More education among the general public is needed to make people aware of the presence of these chemicals in their everyday products so they can make efforts to avoid them.

Indexed as

CosmeticsDietary SupplementsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHousehold ProductsAdolescentAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParabensPhthalic AcidsPilot ProjectsBiomarkersCosmeticsEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsParabensPhthalic Acidsbisphenolsendocrine-disrupting chemicalsparabenspersonal care productsphthalates

Identifiers

PMID39857552
PMCPMC11764522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.