Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857599›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Biological Aging and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review of Telomeres and Beyond.

Rafaela Vostatek, Cihan Ay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Epigenetic Aging Signatures in People with Hemophilia.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rafaela VostatekDivision of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Cihan AyDivision of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-9717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease, and the risk of VTE increases sharply with advancing age, approximately 40% of VTE cases are currently classified as unprovoked, highlighting the importance of risk factor research. While chronological aging is associated with the risk of VTE, the association with biological aging remains unclear. Biological aging is highly complex, influenced by several dysregulated cellular and biochemical mechanisms. In the last decade, advancements in omics methodologies provided insights into the molecular complexity of biological aging. Techniques such as high-throughput genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses identified and quantified numerous epigenetic markers, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites. These methods have also revealed the molecular alterations organisms undergo as they age. Despite the progress, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the methods for assessing and validating these biomarkers, and their application lacks standardization. This review gives an overview of biomarkers of biological aging, including telomere length, and their potential role for VTE. Furthermore, we critically examine the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methods and discuss possible future directions for investigating biological aging in VTE.

Indexed as

biological agingtelomeresvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39857599
PMCPMC11759860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.