ReviewBiomedicines2025
Unraveling the Genetic Heartbeat: Decoding Cardiac Involvement in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- NGS Approaches in Clinical Diagnostics: From Workflow to Disease-Specific Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Fighting for every beat: cardiac therapies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Skeletal muscle · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiomyopathy represents the most important life-limiting condition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients after the age of 20. Genetic alterations in the DMD gene result in the absence of functional dystrophin protein, leading to skeletal/cardiac muscle impairment. The DMD incidence is one in 5000 live male births. Identifying the genetic background, in addition to DMD disease-causing variants, is one of the unmet needs in understanding the cardiac disease's pathogenetic mechanisms and its prognostic implications. The clinical scenario is made even more intricate by the difficulty in predicting the onset and progression of cardiomyopathy, as no clear genotype/phenotype correspondence has been found thus far. The evaluation of genes involved in the onset of primary cardiomyopathies could explore the hypothesis that changes in cytoskeletal and sarcomeric protein function are the modulators of ventricular dysfunction in DMD patients. In the last decade, with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, many disease-causing genes and modifiers have been identified. Assessing the genetic origin of the phenotypic variability of the disease in both the onset and progression of cardiomyopathy in DMD would be extremely helpful in managing these patients. This review article aims to spotlight the genetic background associated with Cardiomyopathy in DMD patients toward a more predictive personalized model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.