Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857772›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis-Where Do We Stand?

Nikhil Vojjala, Supriya Peshin, Lakshmi Prasanna Vaishnavi Kattamuri, Rabia Iqbal, Adit Dharia, Jayalekshmi Jayakumar, Rafi Iftekhar, Shagun Singh, Mamtha Balla, Claudia S Villa Celi and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 4,929 Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nikhil VojjalaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI 48341, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7238-1058
Supriya PeshinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Norton Community Hospital, Norton, VA 24273, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-9474
Lakshmi Prasanna Vaishnavi KattamuriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tech University Health Sciences Centre, El Paso, TX 79905, USA.
Rabia IqbalInternal Medicine, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.
Adit DhariaHCA Florida Oak Hill Hospital, Brooksville, FL 34613, USA.
Jayalekshmi JayakumarInternal Medicine, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7436-635X
Rafi IftekharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Norton Community Hospital, Norton, VA 24273, USA.
Shagun SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Banner Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
Mamtha BallaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Infectious Disease Transplant, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Claudia S Villa CeliInternal Medicine, Capital Health, Trenton, NJ 08638, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-0505
Ramya RamachandranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Banner Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-163X
Rishab PrabhuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI 48341, USA.
Sumeet K YadavDepartment of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN 56001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2927-1408
Geetha KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI 48341, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5371-2253
Vijendra SinghDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Karan SeegobinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN 56001, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke, constituting 0.5-3% of all strokes with an extremely varied spectrum of presentation, predisposing factors, neuroimaging findings, and eventual outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed because timely diagnosis can significantly alter the natural course of the disease, reduce acute complications, and improve long-term outcomes. Due to its myriad causative factors, protean presentation, and association with several systemic diseases, CVT is encountered not only by neurologists but also by emergency care practitioners, internists, hematologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians. DISCUSSION: Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment for CVT. Heparin and warfarin previously had been the anticoagulation of choice. Recently there has been an increased interest in utilizing direct-acting oral anticoagulants in the treatment of CVT given comparable safety and efficacy with ease of utilization. However recent clinical guidelines given by multiple societies including the American Stroke guidelines and European guidelines do not include these agents so far in their treatment recommendations. Ongoing multicentric clinical trials are currently reviewing the role of these agents in both short-term as well as long-term. Our review of the literature supports the safety and reinforces the efficacy of DOAC in the treatment of CVT. Additionally, patient satisfaction has been shown to be better with the use of DOAC. In conclusion, DOAC continues to have a valid role in the management of CVT.

Indexed as

cerebral venous sinus thrombosisdirect-acting oral anticoagulantsefficacysafety

Identifiers

PMID39857772
PMCPMC11759824

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.