Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39858102›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

From Genes to Clinical Practice: Exploring the Genomic Underpinnings of Endometrial Cancer.

Thulo Molefi, Lloyd Mabonga, Rodney Hull, Motshedisi Sebitloane, Zodwa Dlamini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thulo MolefiDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-842X
Lloyd MabongaSAMRC Precision Oncology Research Unit (PORU), DSI/NRF SARChI Chair in Precision Oncology and Cancer Prevention (POCP), Pan African Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Hartfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3073-6110
Rodney HullSAMRC Precision Oncology Research Unit (PORU), DSI/NRF SARChI Chair in Precision Oncology and Cancer Prevention (POCP), Pan African Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Hartfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-3453
Motshedisi SebitloaneDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4002, South Africa.
Zodwa DlaminiSAMRC Precision Oncology Research Unit (PORU), DSI/NRF SARChI Chair in Precision Oncology and Cancer Prevention (POCP), Pan African Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Hartfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-3646

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) 138139South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) 23108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC), a prevalent gynecological malignancy, presents significant challenges due to its genetic complexity and heterogeneity. The genomic landscape of EC is underpinned by genetic alterations, such as mutations in PTEN, PIK3CA, and ARID1A, and chromosomal abnormalities. The identification of molecular subtypes-POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability (MSI), copy number low, and copy number high-illustrates the diverse genetic profiles within EC and underscores the need for subtype-specific therapeutic strategies. The integration of multi-omics technologies such as single-cell genomics and spatial transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding and approach to studying EC and offers a holistic perspective that enhances the ability to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The translation of these multi-omics findings into personalized medicine and precision oncology is increasingly feasible in clinical practice. Targeted therapies such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors have demonstrated the potential for improved treatment efficacy tailored to specific genetic alterations. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in terms of variability in patient responses, the integration of genomic data into clinical workflows, and ethical considerations. This review explores the genomic underpinnings of EC, from genes to clinical practice. It highlights the ongoing need for multidisciplinary research and collaboration to address the complexities of EC and improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CRISPRendometrial cancergenetic alterationsmolecular subtypesmulti-omicspersonalized medicineprecision oncologytargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID39858102
PMCPMC11763595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.