ReviewBiomolecules2025
Decellularized Liver Matrices for Expanding the Donor Pool-An Evaluation of Existing Protocols and Future Trends.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Production to the Clinic: Decellularized Extracellular Matrix as a Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of Acellular Hepatic Scaffolds Through a Low-Cost Gravity-Assisted Perfusion Decellularization Method.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review on Bioengineering the Bovine Mammary Gland: The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and Reconstruction Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the only curative option for end-stage liver disease and is necessary for an increasing number of patients with advanced primary or secondary liver cancer. Many patient groups can benefit from this treatment, however the shortage of liver grafts remains an unsolved problem. Liver bioengineering offers a promising method for expanding the donor pool through the production of acellular scaffolds that can be seeded with recipient cells. Decellularization protocols involve the removal of cells using various chemical, physical, and enzymatic steps to create a collagenous network that provides support for introduced cells and future vascular and biliary beds. However, the removal of the cells causes varying degrees of matrix damage, that can affect cell seeding and future organ performance. The main objective of this review is to present the existing techniques of producing decellularized livers, with an emphasis on the assessment and definition of acellularity. Decellularization agents are discussed, and the standard process of acellular matrix production is evaluated. We also introduce the concept of the stepwise assessment of the matrix during decellularization through decellularization cycles. This method may lead to shorter detergent exposure times and less scaffold damage. The introduction of apoptosis induction in the field of organ engineering may provide a valuable alternative to existing long perfusion protocols, which lead to significant matrix damage. A thorough understanding of the decellularization process and the action of the various factors influencing the final composition of the scaffold is essential to produce a biocompatible matrix, which can be the basis for further studies regarding recellularization and retransplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.