ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024
Multimodal Screening for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Systemic Scleroderma: Current Methods and Future Directions.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an immuno-inflammatory rheumatic disease that can affect both the skin and internal organs through fibrosis. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is one of the most severe secondary complications. Structural changes in the vascular bed lead to increased pressures in the pulmonary circulation, severely impacting the right heart and significantly affecting mortality. The gold standard for diagnosing PAH is right heart catheterization (RHC), an invasive method for measuring cardiac pressure. Due to the high risk of complications, procedural difficulties, and significant costs, non-invasive screening for SSc-PAH has garnered significant interest. Echocardiography is likely the most important screening tool, providing structural and functional information about the right heart through measurements that have proven their utility over time. In addition to imagistic investigations, serum biomarkers aid in identifying patients at risk for PAH and can provide prognostic information. Currently, well-known serum biomarkers (NT-proBNP, uric acid) are used in screening; however, in recent years, researchers have highlighted new biomarkers that can enhance diagnostic accuracy for SSc patients. Pulmonary involvement can also be assessed through pulmonary function tests, which, using established thresholds, can provide additional information and help select patients requiring RHC. In conclusion, given the invasiveness of RHC, non-invasive screening methods are particularly important for SSc patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.