ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evaluation of Structure Prediction and Molecular Docking Tools for Therapeutic Peptides in Clinical Use and Trials Targeting Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Fusion Machinery With Antiviral Peptides: In Silico Exploration of the Heptad Repeat 2 Domain.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Computational and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Phyllanthus Urinaria-Derived Compounds as Potential Anti-Cervical Cancer Agents via HPV-16 E6 Oncoprotein Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Simulation-guided design of peptide-metal coordination interfaces for next-generation metallo-immunotherapy.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Identification of Potential Candidates with Antimicrobial Activity Against Antibiotic-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Integrative molecular simulations reveal NeuroAid II mechanisms in ischemic stroke through network pharmacology, molecular dynamics, and pharmacophore modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From structural insight to molecule: Integrative molecular simulations identify candidate pyruvate kinase activators.PloS one · 2026Article
- From Deep-Sea Natural Product to Optimized Therapeutics: Computational Design of Marizomib Analogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Rescuing Verubecestat: An Integrative Molecular Modeling and Simulation Approach for Designing Next-Generation BACE1 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Unraveling the mechanism of tetracycline-induced renal injury: an evaluation of drug safety based on network toxicology and molecular dynamics simulations.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into Bromocriptine Binding to GPCRs Within Histamine-Linked Signaling Networks: Network Pharmacology, Pharmacophore Modeling, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Computational Investigation of Montelukast and Its Structural Derivatives for Binding Affinity to Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Receptors: Insights from a Comprehensive Molecular Simulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unveiling Pharmacological Mechanisms ofPharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of various structure prediction tools and molecular docking platforms for therapeutic peptides targeting coronary artery disease (CAD). Structure prediction tools, including AlphaFold 3, I-TASSER 5.1, and PEP-FOLD 4, were employed to generate accurate peptide conformations. These methods, ranging from deep-learning-based (AlphaFold) to template-based (I-TASSER 5.1) and fragment-based (PEP-FOLD), were selected for their proven capabilities in predicting reliable structures. Molecular docking was conducted using four platforms (HADDOCK 2.4, HPEPDOCK 2.0, ClusPro 2.0, and HawDock 2.0) to assess binding affinities and interactions. A 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed to evaluate the stability of the peptide-receptor complexes, along with Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) calculations to determine binding free energies. The results demonstrated that Apelin, a therapeutic peptide, exhibited superior binding affinities and stability across all platforms, making it a promising candidate for CAD therapy. Apelin's interactions with key receptors involved in cardiovascular health were notably stronger and more stable compared to the other peptides tested. These findings underscore the importance of integrating advanced computational tools for peptide design and evaluation, offering valuable insights for future therapeutic applications in CAD. Future work should focus on in vivo validation and combination therapies to fully explore the clinical potential of these therapeutic peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.