Evidence mapPaperPMID 39859250Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Residual Traditional Risk in Non-Traditional Atherosclerotic Diseases.

Federico Biscetti, Giorgia Polito, Maria Margherita Rando, Maria Anna Nicolazzi, Luis H Eraso, Paul J DiMuzio, Massimo Massetti, Antonio Gasbarrini, Andrea Flex

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico BiscettiCardiovascular Internal Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-657X
Giorgia PolitoCardiovascular Internal Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Maria Margherita RandoCardiovascular Internal Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Maria Anna NicolazziCardiovascular Internal Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Luis H ErasoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Paul J DiMuzioDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Massimo MassettiDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Pneumologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Andrea FlexCardiovascular Internal Medicine Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with chronic inflammatory and immune disorders are at an increased risk of atherosclerotic events and premature cardiovascular (CV) disease. Despite extensive literature exploring the relationship between "non-traditional" atherosclerotic conditions and CV risk, many aspects remain unresolved, including the underlying mechanisms promoting the "non-traditional CV risk", the development of an innovative and comprehensive CV risk assessment tool, and recommendations for tailored interventions. This review aims to evaluate the available evidence on key "non-traditional" CV risk-enhancer conditions, with a focus on assessing and managing CV risk factors. We conducted a comprehensive review of 412 original articles, narrative and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing the CV risk associated with "non-traditional" atherosclerotic conditions. The analysis examined the underlying mechanisms of these relationships and identified strategies for assessing and mitigating elevated risk. A major challenge highlighted is the difficulty in quantifying the contribution of individual risk factors and disease-specific elements to CV risk. While evidence supports the cardiovascular benefits of statins beyond lipid lowering, such as pleiotropic and endothelial effects, current guidelines lack specific recommendations for the use of statins or other therapies targeting non-traditional CV risk factors. Additionally, the absence of validated cardiovascular risk scores that incorporate non-traditional risk factors hinders accurate CV risk evaluation and management. The growing prevalence of "non-traditional CV risk-enhancer conditions" underscores the need for improved awareness of CV risk assessment and management. A thorough understanding of all contributing factors, including disease-specific elements, is crucial for accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This represents an essential foundation for informed decision-making in primary and secondary prevention. We advocate for future research to focus on developing innovative, disease-specific CV risk assessment tools that incorporate non-traditional risk factors, recognizing this as a promising avenue for translational and clinical outcome research.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsatherosclerosiscardiovascular riskinflammationresidual risk

Identifiers

PMID39859250
PMCPMC11765428

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.