Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Resilience of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats to Secondary Insults After Traumatic Brain Injury: Immediate Seizures, Survival, and Stress Response.

Ilia Komoltsev, Olga Kostyunina, Pavel Kostrukov, Daria Bashkatova, Daria Shalneva, Stepan Frankevich, Olga Salyp, Natalia Shirobokova, Aleksandra Volkova, Aleksandra Soloveva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ilia KomoltsevDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4918-6411
Olga KostyuninaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Pavel KostrukovDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Daria BashkatovaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Daria ShalnevaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Stepan FrankevichDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Olga SalypDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Natalia ShirobokovaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Aleksandra VolkovaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Aleksandra SolovevaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Margarita NovikovaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.
Natalia GulyaevaDepartment of Functional Biochemistry of the Nervous System, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117485, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-7954

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education 2024-2026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the primary causes of mortality and disability, with arterial blood pressure being an important factor in the clinical management of TBI. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), widely used as a model of essential hypertension and vascular dementia, demonstrate dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which may contribute to glucocorticoid-mediated hippocampal damage. The aim of this study was to assess acute post-TBI seizures, delayed mortality, and hippocampal pathology in SHRs and normotensive Sprague Dawley rats (SDRs). Male adult SDRs and SHRs were subjected to lateral fluid-percussion injury. Immediate seizures were video recorded, corticosterone (CS) was measured in blood plasma throughout the study, and hippocampal morphology assessed 3 months post-TBI. Acute and remote survival rates were significantly higher in the SHRs compared to the SDRs (overall mortality 0% and 58%, respectively). Immediate seizure duration predicted acute but not remote mortality. TBI did not affect blood CS in the SHRs, while the CS level was transiently elevated in the SDRs, predicting remote mortality. Neuronal cell loss in the polymorph layer of ipsilateral dentate gyrus was found in both the SDRs and SHRs, while thinning of hippocampal pyramidal and granular cell layers were strain- and area-specific. No remote effects of TBI on the density of astrocytes or microglia were revealed. SHRs possess a unique resilience to TBI as compared with normotensive SDRs. SHRs show shorter immediate seizures and reduced CS response to the injury, suggesting the development of long-term adaptative mechanisms associated with chronic hypertension. Though remote post-traumatic hippocampal damage in ipsilateral dentate gyrus is obvious in both SHRs and SDRs, the data imply that physiological adaptations to high blood pressure in SHRs may be protective, preventing TBI-induced mortality but not hippocampal neurodegeneration. Understanding the mechanisms of resilience to TBI may also help improve clinical recommendations for patients with hypertension. Limitation: since more than a half of the SDRs with prolonged immediate seizures or elevated CS 3 days after TBI have died, survivorship bias might hamper correct interpretation of the data.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHypertensionSeizuresStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsCorticosteroneDisease Models, AnimalHippocampusMaleRatsRats, Inbred SHRRats, Sprague-DawleyCorticosteronecorticosteronedentate gyrushippocampusmicrogliatraumatic brain injury; spontaneously hypertensive rats; Sprague Dawley rats; immediate seizures; mortality

Identifiers

PMID39859543
PMCPMC11765896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.