ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
An Evaluation of the Safety of Intravenous Injections of the Natural Extracellular Hemoglobin M101 in Dogs and Monkeys.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating M101's Effect in Improving Cardiac and Diaphragmatic Mechanical and Functional Properties on Wistar Rat.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Evaluation of bioactive extracellular soluble Hemarina (M101) derived scaffolds for neovascularization in periodontal tissue regeneration.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers have been developed to compensate the needs of blood for transfusions. Most of them were based on intracellular hemoglobin extracted from bovine or human blood, but unfortunately, this type of hemoglobin did not pass through the last steps of clinical trials. In this context, HEMARINA discovered a natural extracellular hemoglobin, possessing several advantages avoiding intracellular hemoglobin-related side effects. Many preclinical studies assessed the safety of M101 used in intravenous (IV) injection in rodents. To explore the safety of IV injections of M101 in large mammals, six dogs received each a single injection of liquid M101 according to a dose escalation with a 48 h follow-up. Then, two monkeys received multiple IV injections of the same dose of M101 every hour for seven hours. This study showed that single and multiple IV injections in dogs and monkeys did not cause clinical or histological lesions, nor did they induce immunological reactions. This makes M101 the best candidate to date for human use in emergency situations requiring blood and, in several diseases, causing hypoxia problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.