Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860467›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Personalized Management of Coronary Artery Disease.

Adrian Bednarek, Karolina Gumiężna, Piotr Baruś, Janusz Kochman, Mariusz Tomaniak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian BednarekFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina GumiężnaFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3423-9832
Piotr BaruśFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Janusz KochmanFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz TomaniakFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-1393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precision of imaging and the number of other risk-assessing and diagnostic methods are constantly growing, allowing for the uptake of additional strategies for individualized therapies. Personalized medicine has the potential to deliver more adequate treatment, resulting in better clinical outcomes, based on each patient's vulnerability or genetic makeup. In addition to increased efficiency, costs related to this type of procedure can be significantly lower. Useful assistance in designing individual therapies may be assured by the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). Recent years have brought essential developments in deep and machine learning techniques. Advances in technologies such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have enabled automatic analyses of images, numerical data, and video data, providing high efficiency in the creation of prediction models. The number of AI applications in medicine is constantly growing, and the effectiveness of these techniques has been demonstrated in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and many others. Moreover, AI models may be useful in direct therapy optimization for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), who are burdened with high risk. The combination of well-trained AI with the design of individual treatment pathways can lead to improvements in health care. However, existing limitations, such as non-adapted guidelines or the lack of randomized clinical trials to evaluate AI's true accuracy, may contribute to delays in introducing automatic methods into practical use. This review critically appraises the developed tools that are potentially useful for clinicians in guiding personalized patient management, as well as current trials in this field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningpersonalized therapy

Identifiers

PMID39860467
PMCPMC11765647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.