ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Explainable AI in Digestive Healthcare and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Lesion Detection: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical Validation of AI-Assisted Evaluation of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures in Digital-Single Operator Cholangioscopy: A Transcontinental Multicentric Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Hemostatic Decision-Making: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications and Implementation Barriers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of artificial intelligence in analysis of endoscopic images to detect residual disease or regrowth in rectal patients with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and digital transformation of gastroenterology and hepatology: A critical review of clinical applications and future challenges.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and FLIP Panometry-Automated Classification of Esophageal Motility Patterns.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A hybrid ViT-L/32-MaxViT-L architecture with adaptive gated fusion for multiclass gastrointestinal disease detection and multi-methodFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Expected Values of Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy Consortium Position Statement.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven personalized dietary recommendations for gastric cancer high-risk populations: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Algorithm: The Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Modern Surgery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A Novel Deep Learning Model for Predicting Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage: A Pioneer Multicenter Transatlantic Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and endoanal ultrasound: pioneering automated differentiation of benign anal and sphincter lesions.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- The Future of Minimally Invasive GI and Capsule Diagnostics (REFLECT), October 2024.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in advanced endoscopic imaging: transforming optical diagnosis in gastroenterology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important impediment to the incorporation of artificial intelligence-based tools into healthcare is their association with so-called black box medicine, a concept arising due to their complexity and the difficulties in understanding how they reach a decision. This situation may compromise the clinician's trust in these tools, should any errors occur, and the inability to explain how decisions are reached may affect their relationship with patients. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to overcome this limitation by facilitating a better understanding of how AI models reach their conclusions for users, thereby enhancing trust in the decisions reached. This review first defined the concepts underlying XAI, establishing the tools available and how they can benefit digestive healthcare. Examples of the application of XAI in digestive healthcare were provided, and potential future uses were proposed. In addition, aspects of the regulatory frameworks that must be established and the ethical concerns that must be borne in mind during the development of these tools were discussed. Finally, we considered the challenges that this technology faces to ensure that optimal benefits are reaped, highlighting the need for more research into the use of XAI in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.