Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Maria Puche-JuarezDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Juan M ToledanoDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Daniel Hinojosa-NogueiraBiomedicine Research Institute of Málaga, IBIMA, and Nanomedicine Platform, BIONAND, Clinical Management Unit of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3303
Catalina de Paco MatallanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Hospital, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Javier Sánchez-RomeroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Hospital, 30120 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4253-3556
Julio J OchoaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8976-6296
Maria Paz CarrilloDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3807-1544
Estefanía Martín-ÁlvarezUnit of Neonatology, Pediatric Service, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Javier Diaz-CastroDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-1757
Jorge Moreno-FernandezDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9690-7851
Funding
Consejería de transformación económica, industria, conomiento y universidades. Junta de Andalucía P21_00040
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Maternal nutrition during pregnancy plays a pivotal role in influencing both maternal and fetal health, impacting neonatal anthropometric outcomes and long-term disease susceptibility. An advanced maternal age (AMA ≥ 35 years) has been linked to increased risks of obstetric complications and adverse neonatal outcomes, yet its specific nutritional profile remains underexplored.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Diet, Advanced Maternal Age, and Neonatal Outcomes: Results from the GESTAGE Study. · full record | Socratic