Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861941›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2025

Involving people with lived experience when setting cerebral palsy research priorities: A scoping review.

Evonne Younan, Sarah McIntyre, Natasha Garrity, Tasneem Karim, Mark Wallace, Paul Gross, Shona Goldsmith

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Building science: Co-production in community.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evonne YounanSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah McIntyreCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-1541
Natasha GarrityCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tasneem KarimSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mark WallaceCP Quest, Cerebral Palsy Alliance, Sydney, Australia.
Paul GrossCerebral Palsy Research Network, Greensville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9833-169X
Shona GoldsmithCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3903-6142

Funding

Cerebral Palsy Alliance
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe research priority-setting activities for cerebral palsy (CP) that have been conducted worldwide involving people with lived experience, focusing on participant characteristics, methods employed, identified research priorities, and collaboration as research partners.

methodThe JBI scoping review approach was followed. Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched for all publications up to February 2024. We extracted study and participant characteristics, methods, and research priorities. Priorities were then categorized into prevention and cure, quality of life and community engagement, and service provision and intervention.

resultsFive studies from North America and Australia met the inclusion criteria. Participants with lived experience were most often parents/caregivers (n = 135, proportion 12-80%), with 54 (proportion 12-25%) people with CP participating in the priority-setting exercises. The studies' methods were varied, with surveys and workshops being the most common. The most reported category of research priorities was optimal intervention. People with lived experience collaborated as research partners (e.g. in aspects of study development/analysis/reporting) in four studies.

interpretationThis review, the first to examine CP research priority-setting efforts on a global scale, identified five activities conducted to date. The small overall number of participants with lived experience of CP, originating only from North America and Australia, highlights the need for increased representation to better reflect the diverse CP community worldwide. Future projects need to address these gaps, using rigorous methodologies, and continued collaboration with research partners to ensure their perspectives shape and enhance the research agenda.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCerebral PalsyHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39861941
PMCPMC12066971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.