Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861988›Full record

Observational studyArtificial organs2025

Short (2-Hour) Non-Oxygenated End-Ischemic Hypothermic Perfusion Versus Cold Storage in the Setting of Renal Transplantation.

Franco Ruberto, Quirino Lai, Mario Piazzolla, Luca Poli, Veronica Zullino, Giulia Diamantini, Matteo Brisciani, Francesco Giovanardi, Fabio Melandro, Silvia Quaresima and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Franco RubertoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7282-9457
Quirino LaiGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario PiazzollaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca PoliGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Veronica ZullinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia DiamantiniGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Matteo BriscianiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco GiovanardiGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fabio MelandroGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia QuaresimaGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Massimo RossiGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Manuela GarofaloGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PuglieseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. End-ischemic hypothermic machine perfusion (EI-HMP) has emerged as a promising method for preserving grafts before transplantation. This study aimed to compare graft function recovery in KT recipients of deceased brain-death (DBD) grafts preserved with EI-HMP versus static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included urine output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay duration, and survival rates.

methodsA retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted at Sapienza University of Rome, analyzing 313 KT patients between January 2014 and September 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on graft preservation methods (EI-HMP, n = 95; SCS, n = 218). A stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was employed to adjust for potential confounders.

resultsThere were no significant differences in DGF rates between the two groups (17.9% vs. 15.6% in SCS and EI-HMP cases, respectively; p = 0.75). EI-HMP group demonstrated a higher urine output on day 2 (p = 0.046), a shorter ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and a trend toward a shorter overall hospital stay (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between EI-HMP and SCS cases in 1- and 3-year overall survival rates (3.2% and 6.7% vs. 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.53) or in death-censored graft loss rates (5.4% and 8.9% vs. 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.88). In a sub-analysis of expanded criteria donors (ECD), EI-HMP demonstrated a protective effect by reducing the risk of DGF (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.09-0.95; p = 0.047).

conclusionEI-HMP was associated with certain short-term benefits, including increased urine output and reduced ICU stays, but showed no significant impact on long-term survival outcomes. A reduction in DGF rates was observed only in the ECD subgroup. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to further investigate the long-term clinical benefits of EI-HMP.

Indexed as

Hypothermia, InducedKidney TransplantationOrgan PreservationPerfusionAdultCold IschemiaDelayed Graft FunctionFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesdeceased brain deathdelayed graft functionKarpinski scorepropensity scoreurine output

Identifiers

PMID39861988
PMCPMC12019098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.