Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39862440›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Machine learning-based risk prediction of outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Australia: the AUS-COVID Score.

Hari P Sritharan, Harrison Nguyen, William van Gaal, Leonard Kritharides, Clara K Chow, Ravinay Bhindi, AUS-COVID Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hari P SritharanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-900X
Harrison NguyenDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia.
William van GaalDepartment of Cardiology, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3076, Australia.
Leonard KritharidesFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Clara K ChowFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ravinay BhindiDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia.
AUS-COVID Investigators

Funding

Paul Ramsay Foundation and the Northern Sydney Local Health District
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to develop a highly interpretable and effective, machine learning (ML)-based risk prediction algorithm to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation, and adverse cardiovascular events in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Australia (AUS-COVID Score). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study across 21 hospitals included 1714 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 in their index hospitalization with COVID-19. The dataset was separated into training (80%) and test sets (20%). Eight supervised ML methods were used: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost, and gradient boosting. A feature selection method was used to establish informative variables, which were considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/all. The final model was selected by balancing the optimal area under the curve (AUC) score with interpretability, through the number of included variables. The coefficients of the final models were used to build the AUS-COVID Score. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among the patients, 181 (10.6%) died in-hospital, 148 (8.6%) required intubation, and 90 (5.3%) had adverse cardiovascular events. The LASSO model performed best for predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.85) using 5 variables: age, respiratory rate, COVID-19 features on chest X-ray, troponin elevation, and COVID-19 vaccination (≥1 dose). The EN model performed best for predicting intubation (AUC 0.75) and adverse cardiovascular events (AUC 0.64), each with 5 variables. A user-friendly web-based application was built for clinician use at the bedside.

conclusionThe AUS-COVID Score is an accurate and practical, ML-based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation, and adverse cardiovascular events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hospital MortalityMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAustraliaCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiescardiovascular diseaseCOVID-19machine learningmortalityrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39862440
PMCPMC12758480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.