Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863322›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Determinants of dementia diagnosis in U.S. primary care in the past decade: A scoping review.

Chelsea G Cox, Barbara L Brush, Lindsay C Kobayashi, J Scott Roberts

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient views on blood-based biomarker tests for Alzheimer's disease in primary care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. System changes to empower primary care in Alzheimer's disease detection and care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chelsea G CoxDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States. Electronic address: chelseak@umich.edu.
Barbara L BrushDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States; Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Lindsay C KobayashiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
J Scott RobertsDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training on Health and AgingT32AG027708 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lindsay C Kobayashi, Briana Mezuk · 2008 to 2026
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are chronically underdiagnosed in the U.S., particularly among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Primary care providers are at the forefront of diagnosis given the increasing prevalence of cases and shortage of dementia specialists. Advances in policy, detection, and treatment in the past decade necessitate an updated review of the current state of determinants of ADRD diagnosis in U.S. primary care settings.

methodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a scoping literature review on ADRD diagnosis among older adults in U.S. primary care settings. Studies published in English from January 2010 to January 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We extracted primary data on study characteristics and synthesized key findings according to facilitators, barriers, and rates of diagnosis in primary care.

resultsOf 563 articles retrieved, 12 met eligibility criteria. Three studies reported rates of diagnosis, and all but one reported facilitators and/or barriers to diagnosis. ADRD remains underdiagnosed in primary care settings, especially in the earliest symptomatic stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment). Multi-level barriers and facilitators were identified including individual beliefs about ADRD (e.g., value of early diagnosis), interpersonal relationships between patients and their family members and providers (e.g., importance of an established clinical relationship), and healthcare system limitations (e.g., insufficient resources and training).

conclusionDespite national policy efforts to improve timely diagnosis of ADRD, underdiagnosis remains a clinical and public health challenge. Increased attention to social and community contexts will be important for future research and intervention.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaPrimary Health CareHumansUnited StatesAlzheimer's disease and related dementiasDetectionDiagnosisMild cognitive impairmentPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39863322
PMCPMC12184027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.