Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient diagnosis of diabetes mellitus using an improved ensemble method.

Blessing Oluwatobi Olorunfemi, Adewale Opeoluwa Ogunde, Ahmad Almogren, Abidemi Emmanuel Adeniyi, Sunday Adeola Ajagbe, Salil Bharany, Ayman Altameem, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Asif Mehmood, Habib Hamam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Blessing Oluwatobi OlorunfemiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun state, Nigeria.
Adewale Opeoluwa OgundeDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun state, Nigeria.
Ahmad AlmogrenDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11633, Saudi Arabia.
Abidemi Emmanuel AdeniyiCollege of Computing and Communication Studies, Bowen University, Iwo, Nigeria.
Sunday Adeola AjagbeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Zululand, Kwadlangezwa, 3886, South Africa.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Ayman AltameemDepartment of Natural and Engineering Sciences, College of Applied Studies and Community Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11543, Saudi Arabia.
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13120, Republic of Korea. ateqrehman@gmail.com.
Asif MehmoodDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, 13120, Republic of Korea. asif@gachon.ac.kr.
Habib HamamFaculty of Engineering, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, E1A3E9, Canada.

Funding

King Saud University RSP2024R498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a growing health concern in developing countries, causing considerable mortality rates. While machine learning (ML) approaches have been widely used to improve early detection and treatment, several studies have shown low classification accuracies due to overfitting, underfitting, and data noise. This research employs parallel and sequential ensemble ML approaches paired with feature selection techniques to boost classification accuracy. The Pima India Diabetes Data from the UCI ML Repository served as the dataset. Data preprocessing included cleaning the dataset by replacing missing values with column means and selecting highly correlated features using forward and backward selection methods. The dataset was split into two parts: training (70%), and testing (30%). Python was used for classification in Jupyter Notebook, and there were two design phases. The first phase utilized J48, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Decision Stump (DS) to create a random forest model. The second phase employed the same algorithms alongside sequential ensemble methods-XG Boost, AdaBoostM1, and Gradient Boosting-using an average voting algorithm for binary classification. Evaluation revealed that XG Boost, AdaBoostM1, and Gradient Boosting achieved classification accuracies of 100%, with performance metrics including F1 score, MCC, Precision, Recall, AUC-ROC, and AUC-PR all equal to 1.00, indicating reliable predictions of diabetes presence. Researchers and practitioners can leverage the predictive model developed in this work to make quick predictions of diabetes mellitus, which could save many lives.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMachine LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansIndiaMaleClassificationDiabetes MellitusGradient boostingRandom forestXG boost

Identifiers

PMID39863685
PMCPMC11762279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.