ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025
Describing the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials: metaresearch study of protocols published between 2012 and 2022.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPublishing protocols promotes transparency and reproducibility. The scope and methods of protocols for nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been investigated yet.
objectivesThis study aims to map the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related interventions research.
methodsWe conducted a metaresearch of nutrition-and diet-related RCT protocols published between January 2012 and March 2022, in any language, targeting human participants, evaluating nutrition interventions isolated or combined. A systematic search of the literature was conducted in 6 online databases. Bibliometric information, study characteristics, and research transparency practices data were collected from the included publications. The instructions for authors of journals with publications in our sample were checked for endorsement of reporting guidelines. Mentions to reporting guidelines in the included protocols were also checked.
resultsAmong the 62,319 records retrieved, 1068 were eligible. The number of published protocols increased annually, with a mean of 103 (range: 32-163) publications/y. Protocols were published in 148 journals, 50 of them (33.8%) endorsed Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT), 111 (75.3%) Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), and 4 (2.7%) Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), whereas 343 (32.1%) protocols mentioned SPIRIT, 297 (27.8%) CONSORT, and 20 (1.9%) TIDieR. Most protocols reported the RCT registration number (n = 1006; 94.2%) and included statements about conflicts of interest (n = 952; 89.1%) and funding (n = 994; 93.2%). About two-thirds of protocols focused on adults or elderly participants (n = 677; 63.4%). Most protocols described 1 isolated nutrition- or diet-related intervention (n = 724; 67.8%), which were most frequently "supplementation, supplements or fortification" (n = 405; 37.9%) or "nutrition education, counseling or coordination of care" (n = 354; 33.1%). The most frequent primary outcomes reported were related to clinical status (n = 308; 28.8%).
conclusionsThe number of protocols for nutrition- or diet-related RCTs published is increasing, supporting the raising awareness and the importance of promoting these publications. The support and mention of relevant reporting guidelines by journals and researchers, respectively, remain far from ideal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.