ArticleScientific reports2025
Cardiovascular disease attenuates the protective effect of folate on global cognitive function in an elderly population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of folic acid supplementation on cardiovascular risk among individuals with hemorrhagic stroke: A prospective study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Investigating the association between the food inflammation scores of individuals and stroke in adults: an extreme gradient boosting machine learning model interpreted with shapley additive explanations.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- From cooperation to collapse: the diet-microbiota-host gene triad in disease and aging.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Vitamin deficiencies and Alzheimer's disease: evidence and implications for supplementation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Vitamins, Vascular Health and Disease.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research suggests that folic acid contributes to improving cognitive function. However, there is a lack of systematic research on the association of dietary intake of folate and serum, and red blood cell (RBC) folate levels with global cognitive impairment (CoI) in the elderly population. Importantly, excessive supplementation with folate among American adults at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) may have harmful effects. CVD often leads to worse cognitive function; therefore, it is necessary to explore the characteristics of the association of folate with CoI in both CVD and non-CVD populations. Participants aged ≥ 60 years from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2011-2014 were included. Dietary intake of folate and serum and RBC folate levels were determined through questionnaires or laboratory measurements. Global cognitive function was assessed via the results of three cognitive assessments. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed to assess the odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and potential non-linearities of folate with cognition. Additionally, the interaction term of CVD with RBC folate was included in the model, and effect modification was detected through likelihood ratio tests. Finally, several sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate our findings. This study included 2104 participants with complete data and a median age of 68 years, with females comprising 51% of the participants. Of the participants, 444 individuals were defined as having CoI. In the NHANES, Pearson correlation analysis revealed moderate to weak correlations between dietary, serum, and RBC folate levels and CoI (all < 0.6). In addition, when different sources of folate were included separately in the models, fully adjusted logistic regression with continuous variables included in the model revealed that only RBC folate was significantly associated with CoI [odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.75-0.97, P = 0.02]. According to tertile groups, compared with participants in the lowest tertile, individuals in the highest tertile of total dietary folate levels (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94, P = 0.02), folic acid levels (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86, P = 0.01), and RBC folate levels (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.85, P = 0.004) had significantly lower odds of having CoI. The RCS showed a linear negative correlation between RBC folate levels and CoI. Furthermore, interaction analysis suggested that CVD attenuated the protective effect of RBC folate. Several sensitivity analyses also suggested a modifying effect of CVD on the association between RBC folate and CoI. A significant negative correlation exists between RBC folate levels and CoI in the elderly population of the United States, and this association is stronger than that of other folate measures. However, the protective effect of RBC folate on CoI is negated in patients with CVD, and further investigation is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.