ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Real-world treatment patterns and health outcomes for patients with myelofibrosis treated with fedratinib.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF)-The German ONKOPEDIA Guideline 2025.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Health Care Utilization Databases obtained from health system inform outcome for ruxolitinib treatment in patients with myelofibrosis.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Myelofibrosis: Treatment Options After Ruxolitinib Failure.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and "real-world" data.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAssess real-world fedratinib (FEDR) treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis following discontinuation of ruxolitinib (RUX). PATIENTS &
methodsThis study was a retrospective, noninterventional medical record review of patients in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 70 physicians (primarily hematologist-oncologists [78.6%]) provided data for 196 eligible patients.
resultsPatients were mostly male (62.8%) with primary myelofibrosis (76.5%) and initiated FEDR at a mean age of 67.7 years. Median treatment duration was 11.5 months (median follow-up, 13.8 months), and nearly half (49.5%) of patients initiated FEDR at the label-indicated dose of 400 mg daily. Six months post-initiation, 77.7% and 66.8% of patients experienced symptom and spleen response, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median progression-free and overall survival from initiation were 23.8 months (95% CI, 21.1-27.6) and 29.8 months (95% CI, 23.9-NE), respectively.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate real-world FEDR effectiveness among patients with myelofibrosis who discontinued RUX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.