Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865609›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

A Dive Into Yeast's Sugar Diet-Comparing the Metabolic Response of Glucose, Fructose, Sucrose, and Maltose Under Dynamic Feast/Famine Conditions.

Koen Johannes Anthonius Verhagen, Ilse Henrike Pardijs, Hendrik Matthijs van Klaveren, Sebastian Aljoscha Wahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Solid-State Fermentation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maltose and Maltotriose Transporters in Brewer'sInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Koen Johannes Anthonius VerhagenDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ilse Henrike PardijsDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Hendrik Matthijs van KlaverenDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Sebastian Aljoscha WahlDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2120-1859

Funding

The research was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) under grant agreement no. 737.016.001.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes experience dynamic conditions in natural habitats as well as in engineered environments, such as large-scale bioreactors, which exhibit increased mixing times and inhomogeneities. While single perturbations have been studied for several organisms and substrates, the impact of recurring short-term perturbations remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to repetitive gradients of four different sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, and maltose. Due to different transport mechanisms and metabolic routes, nonglucose sugars lead to varied intracellular responses. To characterize the impact of the carbon sources and the dynamic substrate gradients, we applied both steady-state and dynamic cultivation conditions, comparing the physiology, intracellular metabolome, and proteome. For maltose, the repeated concentration gradients led to a significant decrease in biomass yield. Under glucose, fructose, and sucrose conditions, S. cerevisiae maintained the biomass yield observed under steady-state conditions. Although the physiology was very similar across the different sugars, the intracellular metabolome and proteome were clearly differentiated. Notably, the concentration of upper glycolytic enzymes decreased for glucose and maltose (up to -60% and -40%, respectively), while an increase was observed for sucrose and fructose when exposed to gradients. Nevertheless, for all sugar gradient conditions, a stable energy charge was maintained, ranging between 0.78 and 0.89. This response to maltose is particularly distinct compared to previous single-substrate pulse experiments or limitation to excess shifts, which led to maltose-accelerated death in earlier studies. At the same time, enzymes of lower glycolysis were elevated. Interestingly, common stress-related proteins (GO term: cellular response to oxidative stress) decreased during dynamic conditions.

Indexed as

FructoseGlucoseMaltoseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSucroseBiomassMetabolomeProteomeFructoseGlucoseMaltoseProteomeSucrose

Identifiers

PMID39865609
PMCPMC11895419

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.