ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2025
Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychiatric and eye disorders associated with use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists' psychopharmacology and putative neuropsychiatric associated effects: a Bradford Hill-informed, systematic, evaluation.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment and Health Outcomes in Methadone-Treated Patients with Opioid Use Disorder and Diabetes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Prehabilitation Reimagined as Policy: A Multidimensional Framework to Reduce Pain, Opioid Use, and Surgical Risk.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Metabolic Modulators in Depression: Emerging Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- GLP-1 and Its Role in Glycogen Production: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor (GLP1R) agonists have become widespread anti-obesity/diabetes pharmaceuticals in the United States.
aimThis article aimed to provide our current knowledge on the plausible mechanisms linked to the role of Ozempic (Semaglutide), which is generalized as one of the anti-addiction compounds.
methodsThe effects of GLP1R agonists in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are mediated, in part, through the downregulation of dopamine signaling. We posit that while GLP1R agonism could offer therapeutic advantages in hyperdopaminergia, it may be detrimental in patients with hypodopaminergia, potentially leading to long-term induction of Suicidal Ideation (SI). The alleged posit of GLP1 agonists to induce dopamine homeostasis is incorrect. This study refined 31 genes based on the targets of Ozempic,
resultsIn-depth silico enrichment analysis revealed an association between candidate genes and depressive phenotypes linked with dopaminergic signaling. Finally, through primary and in-depth silico analyses, we demonstrated multiple findings supporting that GLP1R agonists can induce depression phenotypes.
conclusionOur findings suggest that associated polymorphisms seem to have overlapping effects with addictive behaviors of Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) and dopamine regulation. Consequently, GLP1R agonists may represent a double-edged sword, potentially triggering both antiaddictive effects and SI by exacerbating depressive phenotypes. Thus, we encourage the scientific community to perform further empirical clinical studies to confirm this proposed pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.