ArticleBJPsych open2025
The diagnostic conundrum of late-onset developmental regression in child psychiatry: case series.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Insights into Neurological Regression with a Focus on Rett Syndrome-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopmental regression in children, in the absence of neurological damage or trauma, presents a significant diagnostic challenge. The complexity is further compounded when it is associated with psychotic symptoms.
methodWe discuss a case series of ten children aged 6-10 years, with neurotypical development, presenting with late-onset developmental regression (>6 years of age), their clinical course and outcome at 1 year. A comprehensive clinical evaluation, laboratory investigations and neuroimaging ruled out any identifiable neurological cause.
resultsMean age at regression was 7.65 (s.d. 1.5) years and mean illness duration was 10.1 (s.d. 8.5) months. The symptom domains included regression (in more than two domains - cognitive, socio-emotional, language, bowel and bladder incontinence), emotional disturbances, and hallucinatory and repetitive behaviours. Response to treatment was gradual over 6 months to 1 year. At 1-year follow-up, nine children did not attain pre-regression functioning, and residual symptoms included not attaining age-appropriate speech and language, socio-emotional reciprocity and cognitive abilities.
conclusionsThese cases demonstrate a unique pattern of regression with psychiatric manifestations, distinct from autism spectrum disorder and childhood-onset schizophrenia. The diagnostic dilemma arises from the overlap of symptoms with childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), childhood-onset schizophrenia and autism. This study underscores the diagnostic intricacies of this clinical presentation and highlights the need for longitudinal follow-up to unravel the transitions in phenomenology, course and outcome. For severe manifestations such as developmental regression, where the illness is still evolving, considering CDD as a non-aetiological and transitory/tentative diagnosis would aid against premature diagnostic categorisation and provide scope for ongoing aetiological search.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.