ArticleHeliyon2025
International youth football research developments: A CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of IL-4Rα and IL-5/IL-5R Targeted Biologic Therapies in Type 2 Inflammatory Airway Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Knowledge mapping of photodynamic therapy in bladder cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Integrated Anthropometric, Physiological and Biological Assessment of Elite Youth Football Players Using Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Involution and governance reform in professional football club-school integration: a case study of S City's youth training base.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- The decade of China's football reform: Evolutionary characteristics, performance evaluation, and reflections and insights.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the vigorous development of football, research on youth football has garnered significant attention from scholars, leading to an increase in published findings. However, there is currently no comprehensive retrospective study that examines the status, hotspots, and trends of research in this field. This study employed Cite Space, a visual bibliometric software, to systematically review and analyze 1637 articles from the Web of Science (WOS) and China Knowledge Infrastructure Project (CNKI) databases up to January 2024. The primary objective was to examine the sources, authors, institutions, regions, citations, as well as keywords, and clustering of these articles to identify the global research hotspots and trends in youth football. The study concluded that the number of research articles in this field has been decreasing annually, and the research hotspots are exhibiting a gradual downward trend. The primary research institutions are comprehensive universities, supplemented by research centers and hospitals. The United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, and China have produced substantial research results in this area, and collaboration among researchers is relatively strong, indicating a positive development trajectory. Current research hotspots include sports monitoring and evaluation, sports injury and risk, talent identification and development, sports performance, the integration of sports and education, school football, and youth training systems. This finding provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape in this field and presents opportunities for researchers to pursue further in-depth investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.