ArticleHeliyon2025
Comprehensive analysis reveals cholesterol metabolism-related signature for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized treatment of glioma.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid metabolism as a marker for glioma aggressiveness.Bioscience reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a robust cuproptosis related signature for primary glioma via machine learning aided by loop training and validation.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gliomas are the most common intracranial tumors with the highest degree of malignancy. Disturbed cholesterol metabolism is one of the key features of many malignant tumors, including gliomas. This study aimed to investigate the significance of cholesterol metabolism-related genes in prognostic prediction and in guiding individualized treatment of patients with gliomas. Methods: Transcriptional data and clinicopathological data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) databases. Intraoperative glioma samples retained in our unit and the corresponding clinicopathological information were also collected with the patients' knowledge. Firstly, cholesterol metabolism-related gene signatures (CMRGS) were identified and constructed based on difference analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and univariate/multivariate COX analysis. Then, the role of CMRGS in predicting the prognosis of gliomas and distinguishing immune landscapes was evaluated by using nomograms, survival analysis, enrichment analysis, and immune-infiltration analysis. Finally, the drug sensitivity of gliomas in different risk groups was evaluated using the oncoPredict algorithm, and potentially sensitive chemotherapeutic and molecular-targeted drugs were identified. Results: The prognostic CMRGS contained seven genes: APOE, SCD, CXCL16, FABP5, S100A11, TNFRSF12A, and ELOVL2. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median cholesterol metabolic index (CMI). There were significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival between groups. COX analysis suggested that CMRGS was an independent risk factor for glioma prognosis and had a better predictive performance than several classical indicators. In addition, GSEA, immune infiltration analysis showed that CMRGS could differentiate the immune landscapes of patients in groups. The reliability of CMRGS was validated in the CGGA cohort and our Gusu cohort. Finally, 14 drugs sensitive to high-risk patients and 16 drugs sensitive to low-risk patients were identified. Conclusion: The CMRGS reliably predicts glioma prognosis in multiple cohorts and may be useful in guiding individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.