ArticleBone reports2025
Integrating deep learning and machine learning for improved CKD-related cortical bone assessment in HRpQCT images: A pilot study.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bone research.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Applications of Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Radiomics identifies distinct cortical bone texture alterations in patients with CKD using HR-pQCT.Bone research · 2026Article
- Advancements in High-Resolution Computed Tomography: Revolutionising Bone Health Micro-Research.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) offers detailed bone geometry and microarchitecture assessment, including cortical porosity, but assessing chronic kidney disease (CKD) bone images remains challenging. This proof-of-concept study merges deep learning and machine learning to 1) improve automatic segmentation, particularly in cases with severe cortical porosity and trabeculated endosteal surfaces, and 2) maximize image information using machine learning feature extraction to classify CKD-related skeletal abnormalities, surpassing conventional DXA and CT measures. We included 30 individuals (20 non-CKD, 10 stage 3 to 5D CKD) who underwent HRpQCT of the distal and diaphyseal radius and tibia and contributed data to develop and validate four different AI models for each anatomical site. Manually annotated cortical bone was used to train each segmentation deep-learning model. Textural features were extracted via Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and classified as CKD or non-CKD using XGBoost with each segmentation model. For comparison, manufacturer-supplied segmentation was used to extract cortical geometry, microarchitecture, and finite element analysis (FEA) outcomes. Model performance was confirmed using the test dataset and a separate independent validation cohort which included HRpQCT imaging from 42 additional individuals (18 non-CKD, 24 CKD stage 5D). For segmentation, the diaphyseal location showed strong performance on test datasets, with Mean IoUs of 0.96 and 0.95, and accuracies of 0.97 for both radius and tibia sites in CKD. Model 4 developed from the diaphyseal tibia region excelled in classifying test and independent validation datasets, achieving F1 scores of 0.99 and 0.96, AUCs of 0.99 and 0.94, sensitivities of 0.99, and specificities of 0.99 and 0.92. No single parameter, including BMD and cortical porosity, among conventional CT outcomes consistently differentiated CKD from non-CKD across all anatomical sites. Integrating HRpQCT with deep and machine learning, this innovative approach enables precise automatic segmentation of severely deteriorated endocortical surfaces and enhances sensitivity to CKD-related cortical bone changes compared to standard DXA and HRpQCT outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.