ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
The Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on the Development of Preeclampsia in Twin Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study Conducted at a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: a systematic review of machine learning models and clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on the risk of pregnancy complications in twin pregnancies and to investigate the relationship between glycemic levels and the risk of preeclampsia (PE) and abnormal fetal growth. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 736 twin pregnancies was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic models were utilized to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between twin pregnancies with GDM and those without GDM. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to address the intertwin correlation between glycemic levels and the primary outcomes. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of PE between non-GDM and GDM pregnancies (OR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.38-1.27; P = 0.238). No statistically significant differences were observed in the prevalence of small for gestational age and large for gestational age between the study groups. A comparative analysis of twin pregnancies affected by PE and GDM versus those without GDM revealed that the former group exhibited similar maternal and neonatal outcome risks. Women with fasting blood glucose levels from 5.1 mmol/L (92mg/dL) to less than 5.3 mmol/L (95.6mg/dL) had a significantly higher risk of PE compared with women without GDM (OR, 2.90; 95% CI: 1.12-7.51; P = 0.028). In subgroups of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), HbA1c ≥ 5.5% had the highest risk of PE in the second and third trimesters compared with women without GDM (OR, 4.90; 95% CI: 1.00-24.12; P = 0.05). Conclusion: The risk of PE was not increased in twin pregnancies complicated with GDM, but significantly increased in women with an HbA1c ≥5.5%. No significant associations were observed between the co-occurrence of GDM and PE and the incidence of pregnancy complications in twin pregnancies. Strict glycemic control may decrease the risk of PE in twin pregnancies with GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.