Evidence mapPaperPMID 39866853Full record

ArticleCell reports. Physical science2024

A variational graph-partitioning approach to modeling protein liquid-liquid phase separation.

Gaoyuan Wang, Jonathan Warrell, Suchen Zheng, Mark Gerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Physical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaoyuan WangProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Jonathan WarrellProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Suchen ZhengProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Mark GersteinProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Funding

Interpretable Deep Learning Methods to Investigate Genetics and Epigenetics of Alzheimer's Disease at a Single-Cell ResolutionR01NS128523 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · 2025 to 2025
$622k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful tools for representation learning. Their efficacy depends on their having an optimal underlying graph. In many cases, the most relevant information comes from specific subgraphs. In this work, we introduce a GNN-based framework (graph-partitioned GNN [GP-GNN]) to partition the GNN graph to focus on the most relevant subgraphs. Our approach jointly learns task-dependent graph partitions and node representations, making it particularly effective when critical features reside within initially unidentified subgraphs. Protein liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a problem especially well-suited to GP-GNNs because intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are known to function as protein subdomains in it, playing a key role in the phase separation process. In this study, we demonstrate how GP-GNN accurately predicts LLPS by partitioning protein graphs into task-relevant subgraphs consistent with known IDRs. Our model achieves state-of-the-art accuracy in predicting LLPS and offers biological insights valuable for downstream investigation.

Identifiers

PMID39866853
PMCPMC11760192

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.