Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866968›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Oral health care in older people in long-term care facilities: An updated systematic review and meta-analyses of implementation strategies.

Lina F Weening-Verbree, Anouk Douma, Cees P van der Schans, Getty J Huisman-de Waal, Annemarie A Schuller, Sytse U Zuidema, Wim P Krijnen, Johannes S M Hobbelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lina F Weening-VerbreeResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing and FAITH Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anouk DoumaCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen A, Deusinglaan 1 FB 21, 9713, AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cees P van der SchansResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing and FAITH Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Getty J Huisman-de WaalDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, 6525, EP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annemarie A SchullerCenter for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen A, Deusinglaan 1 FB 21, 9713, AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sytse U ZuidemaDepartment of Primary and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196 FA21, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wim P KrijnenResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing and FAITH Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes S M HobbelenResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing and FAITH Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oral health care of older people in long-term care facilities is insufficient, stressing the need for clear evidence-based implementation strategies to improve oral care. In 2013, a systematic review was performed and new evidence was published. This study aimed to gain insights into implementation strategies used to promote or improve oral health care for older people in long-term care facilities, explore their effectiveness and uncover strategy content in behavioral change techniques, and report the differences between the current results and those of the 2013 study. Methods: A systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines and meta-analyses of implementation strategies were performed. Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CINAHL databases were searched for papers published between 2011 and 2023. Strategies were identified using the Coding Manual for Behavioral Change Techniques. Meta-analyses of oral health outcomes ("plaque" and "denture plaque") were performed with random-effects models using R language for statistical computing. Results: 16 studies were included in the current results; 20 studies were included in the 2013 findings. More high-quality studies (67 %) were included in this review than in 2013 (47 %). Dental care professionals were involved in 14 of the 16 studies. Fourteen of the 16 studies used and/ or combined five or more different implementation strategies: knowledge, intention, awareness, self-efficacy, attitude, and facilitation of behavior. Implementation positively affected the knowledge and attitudes of the nursing staff; however, the oral health of older people did not necessarily improve. In the 2013 review, more studies indicated combined oral health measurements were effective (71 %) than in the current review (20 %-33 %). Meta-analysis of four studies on dental plaque (0-3 scale) showed a significant, statistically small mean difference of -.21 (CI -.36; -.07, Cohen's Conclusions: In this review, more implementation strategies and combinations were used to implement oral care in long-term care. Implementation strategies positively affected the knowledge and attitudes of nursing staff; however, the oral health of older people did not necessarily improve. Meta-analyses on plaque showed that oral care implementations are effective; for denture plaque, the effect size was large and thus may have more clinical value than for dental plaque.

Indexed as

ImplementationMeta-analysesNursing staffOlder peopleOral healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39866968
PMCPMC11757228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.