ReviewCureus2024
Adolescents' Diabetes Self-Management Regimens and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents with diabetes mellitus (DM) experience poorer glycemic outcomes and lower adherence to self-management regimens compared to other age groups. The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed new barriers to DM self-management, including social distancing measures and additional stressors. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to examine self-management regimens and outcomes among adolescents aged 10-17 years with type 1 and type 2 DM during the pandemic. Our scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched three online databases, screened articles through a rigorous process, and assessed bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists. The findings from the included articles were categorized into six thematic areas: glycemic control/monitoring, insulin administration/regimens, weight/lifestyle behaviors, inpatient care/acute complications, outpatient care/telemedicine utilization, and psychosocial well-being. The findings from the included articles (n = 32) varied. Adolescents who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), regularly adjusted insulin doses, and utilized telemedicine generally maintained or improved glycemic control during the pandemic. However, many adolescents gained weight, reduced their physical activities, worsened their diet and sleep habits, and experienced increased stress, all of which negatively impacted glycemic control. Rates of acute complications and hospitalizations varied among adolescents. Telemedicine was widely used and viewed positively by adolescents with DM. Adolescents with DM faced various physical, behavioral, and psychosocial challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impacts of the pandemic on this population. Multilevel interventions and preparedness efforts are required to improve and sustain adolescents' DM self-management outcomes during public health emergencies, particularly focused on promoting CGM use, increasing physical activity levels, improving dietary habits, and reducing stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.