ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Global DNA methylomes reveal oncogenic-associated 5-hydroxylmethylated cytosine (5hmC) signatures in the cell-free DNA of cancer patients.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterization of tumor epigenetic aberrations is integral to understanding the mechanisms of tumorigenesis and provide diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information of high clinical relevance. Among the different tumor-associated epigenetic signatures, 5 methyl-cytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are the two most well-characterized DNA methylation alterations linked to cancer pathogenesis. 5hmC has a tissue-specific distribution and its abundance is subjected to changes in tumor DNA, making it a promising biomarker. Detecting tumor-related DNA methylation alterations in tissues is highly invasive, while the analysis of the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is poised to supplement, if not replace, surgical biopsies. Despite many studies attempted to identify new epigenetic targets for liquid biopsy assays, little is known about the regulatory roles of 5hmC, its impacts on the molecular phenotypes in tumors. Most importantly, whether the oncogenic-associated 5hmC signatures found in tumor tissues can be recapitulated in patients' cfDNA. In this study, we performed the unbiased and simultaneous detection of 5mC and 5hmC whole-genome DNA modifications at base-resolution from two distinct cancer cohorts, from patients with bladder cancer or B-Cell lymphoma, their corresponding normal tissues, and cfDNAs from plasma. We analyzed tissue-specific methylation patters and searched for signatures in gene coding and regulatory regions linked to cancerous states. We then looked for methylation signatures in patients' cfDNA to determine if they were consistent with the tumor-specific patterns. We determined the functional significance of 5hmC in tissue specific transcription and uncovered hundreds of tumor-associated 5hmC signatures. These tumor-associated 5hmC changes, particularly in genes and enhancers, were functionally significant in tumorigenesis pathways and correlated with tumor specific gene expression. To investigate if cfDNA is a faithful surrogate for tumor-associated 5hmC, we devised a targeted capture strategy to examine the alterations of 5hmC in cfDNA from patients with bladder cancer and lymphoma with sufficient sensitivity and specificity and confirmed that they recapitulated the patterns we observed in tumor tissues. Our results provide analytic validation of 5hmC as a cancer-specific biomarker. The methods described here for systematic characterization of 5hmC at functional elements open new avenues to discover epigenetic markers for non-invasive diagnosis, monitoring, and stratifying cancer.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.