Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867433›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2024

The manipulation of odor availability of training aids used in detection canine training.

Katylynn B Sloan, Michele N Maughan, Caitlin E Sharpes, Robin R Greubel, Shawna F Gallegos, Aleksandr E Miklos, Lindsay D Waldrop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katylynn B SloanAdvanced Research and Capabilities Division, United States Secret Service, Washington, DC, United States.
Michele N MaughanPrecise Systems, Inc., Lexington Park, MD, United States.
Caitlin E SharpesPrecise Systems, Inc., Lexington Park, MD, United States.
Robin R GreubelK9Sensus Foundation, Lucas, IA, United States.
Shawna F GallegosOak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Aleksandr E MiklosApplied Synthetic Biology and Olfaction Branch, U.S. Army DEVCOM Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States.
Lindsay D WaldropSchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection canines can identify numerous substances for which they have been trained. Historically, and a point of ongoing contention, detection canine threshold (i.e., sensitivity or limit of detection) training has primarily focused on changing the weight of the training aid substance used. There has been minimal focus on other principles, such as surface area, confinement, and temperature, which can be manipulated to affect odor availability. That said, trainers have been manipulating odor availability for years without necessarily understanding the governing scientific principles. The aim of this review is to highlight the principles that control odor availability of a substance and how an end user can apply these principles for operational detection canine training needs.

Indexed as

caninedispersiondog trainingodor movementolfactory sciencescent detectiontraining aids

Identifiers

PMID39867433
PMCPMC11758185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.