Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867472›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Therapeutic functions of medical implants from various material categories with integrated biomacromolecular systems.

Guilherme Bedeschi Calais, Guilherme Domingos Garcia, Celso Fidelis de Moura Júnior, José Diego Magalhães Soares, Liliane Maria Ferrareso Lona, Marisa Masumi Beppu, Jacobo Hernandez-Montelongo, João Batista Maia Rocha Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guilherme Bedeschi CalaisUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering and Bioprocesses, Campinas, Brazil.
Guilherme Domingos GarciaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering and Bioprocesses, Campinas, Brazil.
Celso Fidelis de Moura JúniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering and Bioprocesses, Campinas, Brazil.
José Diego Magalhães SoaresFederal University of Alagoas, Center of Technology, Maceió, Brazil.
Liliane Maria Ferrareso LonaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering and Bioprocesses, Campinas, Brazil.
Marisa Masumi BeppuUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), School of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Engineering and Bioprocesses, Campinas, Brazil.
Jacobo Hernandez-MontelongoUniversidad Católica de Temuco, Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Bioproducts and Advanced Materials Research Center (BioMA), Temuco, Chile.
João Batista Maia Rocha NetoFederal University of Alagoas, Center of Technology, Maceió, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical implants are designed to replace missing parts or improve body functions and must be capable of providing structural support or therapeutic intervention for a medical condition. Advances in materials science have enabled the development of devices made from metals, polymers, bioceramics, and composites, each with its specific advantages and limitations. This review analyzes the incorporation of biopolymers, proteins, and other biomacromolecules into implants, focusing on their role in biological integration and therapeutic functions. It synthesizes advancements in surface modification, discusses biomacromolecules as carriers for controlled drug release, and explores the application of nanoceramics and composites to improve osseointegration and tissue regeneration. Biomacromolecule systems are capable of interacting with device components and therapeutic agents - such as growth factors (GFs), antibiotics, and nanoceramics - allowing control over substance release. Incorporating therapeutic agents into these systems enables localized treatments for tissue regeneration, osseointegration, post-surgery infection control, and disease and pre-existing conditions. The review highlights these materials' therapeutic advantages and customization opportunities, by covering mechanical and biological perspectives. Developing composites and hybrid drug delivery systems align with recent efforts in interdisciplinary personalized medicine and implant innovations. For instance, a trend was observed for integrating inorganic (especially nanoceramics, e.g., hydroxyapatite) and organic phases in composites for better implant interaction with biological tissues and faster recovery. This article supports understanding how integrating these materials can create more personalized, functional, durable, and biocompatible implant devices.

Indexed as

biopolymerceramiccompositemedical implantmetalpolymertherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID39867472
PMCPMC11757644

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.