ReviewSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Neurocognitive dysfunctions in childhood-onset schizophrenia: A systematic review.
Review in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paving the way for integrating genetic testing into clinical care in childhood-onset schizophrenia.General psychiatry · 2026Article
- Childhood-Onset Psychosis: A large UK case series.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Dealing with Early-Onset Schizophrenia and the Role of Lurasidone: An Expert Opinion.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- ADHD and schizophrenia: Mere prodromal variant or homogeneous subgroup?Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2025Article
- Abnormal serum IL-10 and IL-19 levels in childhood- and adolescent-onset schizophrenia: associations with negative symptoms and language function.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Managing Symptoms in Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review of Therapeutic Interventions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic review of neurocognitive dysfunctions in patients with childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS), a neuropsychiatric disorder that occurs before age 13 and is rarer and more severe than adult-onset schizophrenia. Method: A search was made in the PubMed database. Sixty-seven studies (out of 543) which analyzed Intellectual Quotient (IQ), attentional, memory and executive functions were selected by two independent researchers. Study's appraisal was done according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024548945). Result: COS shows neurocognitive dysfunction in IQ with mean scores ranging from one to two standard deviation lower than normative data. Attentional deficits are observed with longer reaction time, more errors of omission and commission and slower processing speed than controls. In addition, working memory and executive functions, such as planification and flexibility are impaired. COS exhibit significantly more neurocognitive deficits than adolescent and adult-onset forms and display deterioration in intellectual functioning between premorbid period and after onset of psychosis. Conclusion: COS is characterized by major cognitive impairments, both before the onset of the disease and throughout its course. As in adult-onset schizophrenia, generalized cognitive impairment is found without the emergence of a specific profile, providing further support for the continuum hypothesis between early-onset and adult-onset schizophrenia. Collaborative research on a larger scale (including meta-analyses) and using complementary approaches (dimensional and multimodal) is needed to gain a better understanding of the cognitive impact of COS and pave the way for more precise and targeted cognitive remediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.