ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Construction of an interactive humanistic nursing model in emergency rescue of epidemic outbreaks.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of the interactive humanistic nursing model in emergency rescue of epidemic outbreaks. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 200 patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University between December 2022 and March 2023 were selected and divided into the observation group(n=100) and the control group(n=100) according to different nursing methods used. Patients in the control group received conventional basic nursing intervention, and those in the observation group received humanistic nursing based on basic nursing care. Compared the psychological status, treatment compliance, clinical efficacy, and nursing quality management between the two groups of patients. Results: The treatment compliance of both groups of patients was significantly improved after intervention, and the degree of improvement in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Hospital stay and time to symptom relief and disappearance were shortened in the observation group compared with those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (p<0.05). The scores of nursing efficacy, nursing satisfaction, and nursing safety were increased in the observation group compared with those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (p<0.05). Conclusion: The interactive humanistic nursing model effectively improves the psychological status of patients and increases treatment compliance, clinical efficacy, and nursing quality, which is worthy of clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.