Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39868385›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2025

Pesticide residues and their detection techniques in foods using sensors- a review.

Khalid Bashir, Shalini Shikha, Gurdeep Rattu, Kulsum Jan, P Murali Krishna, Sudip K Pattanayek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khalid BashirDepartment of Food Technology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062 India.ORCID 0000-0002-8191-4263
Shalini ShikhaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110062 India.
Gurdeep RattuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Applied Sciences, Reva University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560064 India.
Kulsum JanDepartment of Food Technology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062 India.
P Murali KrishnaDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Kundli, Haryana 131028 India.
Sudip K PattanayekDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110062 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of pesticides in agricultural produce is continuously increasing and it raises the question of whether the food is safe or not. Only 0.1% of the sprayed pesticide reaches its target and the rest acts as a contaminant in soil and the environment, thus contaminating the future foods as well. The pesticide residue management is gaining attention as pesticide poisoning account for more than 3.5% of total deaths. The use of pesticides needs to be checked and applied in a controlled manner. Easy and rapid methods for the quantification of pesticides in foods need to be developed. In the present review, details about pesticides have been described in the first part. Secondly, the techniques and recent developments for the detection of pesticides have been summarized and finally, the emerging challenges and future perspectives for pesticide handling has been discussed with special emphasis on the use of Nano-sensors for pesticide detection. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-024-06116-8.

Indexed as

ContaminantsDetection methodsFoodNano-sensorsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID39868385
PMCPMC11757846

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.