ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2025
Fast, Present and Future of the Concept of Spondyloarthritis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAxial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a rather prevalent chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease that affects already relatively young patients. It has been known better since the end of the nineteenth century but quite a lot has been learned since the early 60ies when the first classification (diagnostic) criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were agreed on. I have been part of many developments in the last 30 years, and I'm happy to have been able to contribute to the scientific progress in terms of diagnosis, imaging, pathophysiology and therapy. When I was asked to write a manuscript about the SpA concept I felt honored. Thus, the purpose of this extensive review was, on the one hand, to describe the history of AS and axSpA, and on the other hand, to reason about the concept and the gestalt of axSpA, and finally to deliver some ideas what future researchers could possibly do to further study the disease. RECENT
findingsThe last 3 decades were full of innovations for both, classification and treatment of axSpA which also helped us to learn about the pathophysiology. Thus, TNFa, IL-17, IL-23 and Janus kinase are established targets to reduce inflammation. IL-17 and IL-23 are very special in that regard because they both work for psoriasis but only anti-IL-17 agents which don't work in IBD are approved for axSpA, while IL 23 inhibitors are approved for both, psoriasis and IBD, but they don't work in axSpA. New imaging techniques such as low dose CT and synthetic MRI are likely to improve the detection of both active and structural lesions of axSpA. This manuscript tries to describe the most important findings about axSpA. The main aim of research remains to discover the pathophysiology and to further improve treatment options in order to reduce and abolish inflammation and prevent new bone formation to increase the quality of life of our patients. The differences between male and female disease and the role of the immune system in axSpA are now the main challenges, and the role of special T-cell receptors seem to deserve special interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39869233What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.