Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869260›Full record

ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025

New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.

Lea Gerischer, Paolo Doksani, Sarah Hoffmann, Andreas Meisel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Disease changes and cost analysis of myasthenia gravis: a 10 years retrospective study from a reference center in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role and mechanism of IL‑35 in myasthenia gravis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea GerischerDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (NCRC) and Integrated Myasthenia Gravis Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Charitéplatz 1, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-068X
Paolo DoksaniDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (NCRC) and Integrated Myasthenia Gravis Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Charitéplatz 1, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5381-5995
Sarah HoffmannDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (NCRC) and Integrated Myasthenia Gravis Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Charitéplatz 1, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-2594
Andreas MeiselDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (NCRC) and Integrated Myasthenia Gravis Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Charitéplatz 1, Germany. andreas.meisel@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-5342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by exertion-induced muscle weakness that can lead to potentially life-threatening myasthenic crises. Detectable antibodies are directed against specific postsynaptic structures of the neuromuscular junction. MG is a chronic condition that can be improved through therapies, but to date, not cured. Standard treatment has been unchanged for decades and includes symptomatic treatment with acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors and disease-modifying treatment with steroids, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Overall, a relevant proportion of patients does not achieve a satisfactory clinical improvement under standard treatment. Additionally, long-term therapy with steroids can cause significant side effects and latency to clinical improvement with standard steroid-sparing immunosuppressants and after thymectomy can take months to years. In recent years, treatment of MG has changed fundamentally due to improved evidence from phase 3 trials and the regulatory approval of complement inhibitors and FcRn inhibitors as add-on treatment options. This provides new optimism for substantially more patients reaching minimal manifestation status and has led to a shift in treatment strategy with more targeted therapies being employed early in the course of the disease, especially in patients with high disease activity. In this focussed review, we provide an overview of the diagnosis, classification and standard treatment of MG, followed by data from randomised controlled trials on the modern drugs already available for therapy and those still in the final stages of clinical development. In the second part, we provide an overview of real-world data for already approved therapies and outline how the availability of new biologicals is changing both clinical decision-making and patient journey.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyClinical Decision-MakingMyasthenia GravisComplement Inactivating AgentsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsReceptors, FcThymectomyComplement Inactivating AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsReceptors, Fc

Identifiers

PMID39869260
PMCPMC11906560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.